Newsroom

Newsroom

International Migration Review Forum: Consensus Adoption of Progress Declaration a Significant Step Forward

10th June 2022

Laurel and Marisa at IMRF

The first International Migration Review Forum (IMRF) took place in New York from May 16th to the 20th, gathering Member States, civil society representatives, migrants, and United Nations agencies. The IMRF was the first global opportunity to review the implementation of the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly, and Regular Migration (GCM) and discuss challenges since its adoption in 2018.  Following a multistakeholder hearing, the four-day Forum concluded with the adoption by consensus of the Progress Declaration. The endorsement by the General Assembly of the Progress Declaration on June 7th also by consensus indicates a welcome step in the maturing of migration multilateralism in the UN and grounded in human rights.

The IMRF has been a significant focus for the Human Rights and Refugees (HRR) Programme as we have sought to support progress on dismantling systemic racism in migration governance, advance meaningful migrant participation, prevent deaths and loss of life, and ensure human rights-based post-COVID migration governance, including in relation to border management in health crises.

In addition to a series of briefing papers on both process and positions, QUNO engaged with the development of the Progress Declaration, speaking at all four townhalls with the co-facilitators and engaging with diplomats in New York.

At the IMRF, Laurel Townhead Representative for the HRR programme, moderated the first thematic session of the multistakeholder hearing in which she remarked, “stakeholders are not just partners in implementation, crucially we are also critics, advocates, eyes, and ears open to the lived realities of the success and failures of migration governance for people and communities. If everything you hear today suggests unbounded progress or if everything you hear today is comfortable, then we are not having the right conversation. Because for too many people migration is not comfortable, it is not safe. And to ignore this would add to the dehumanization of migrants and would be a disservice to what we can do collectively if we ground our aims in the recognition of the inherent dignity and the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family”.The recording of the multistakeholder session is available here and the link to summary report here.

QUNO co-sponsored two side events:

  • By Migrants, For Migrants: Advancing for Migrant’s Meaningful Participation in IMRF and the GCM Processes, where Marisa Leon Gomez Sonet spoke:  Meaningful participation is not a simple tick-box exercise, nor is it inherently neutral. It is often said that migrants do not have a voice and that others can provide that voice. Migrants do have a voice, they have agency and resiliency, but are often excluded and marginalized. See the recording of the migrant participation side event.
  • Preparedness for the Next Pandemic: Towards a Resilient Global Architecture on Borders and Health, Laurel spoke: I hope this collective endeavor will succeed for governments and for migrants in all their diversity because a global border and health architecture that meets these [human rights based]criteria is not just the smart thing to do from governance, economic, predictability, perspective. It is also the right thing to do from a human perspective. See the recording of the side event here.

We were grateful for the opportunity to be in person again amongst so many people bringing their expertise and experience to bear on improving migration governance, not because of the economic benefits of migration for States but because of the inherent humanity of all migrants. We also want to acknowledge those who could not join us at the IMRF – for a multiplicity of reasons: because they could not access vaccines and documentation that would enable travel; because they do not think UN rooms are places where they are welcome or will be heard; because they are in a place of struggle and survival; because it would not be safe for them to engage; because, as the Secretary-General highlighted in his report, deterrence based migration policies lead to irreparable harm.

The IMRF was a steppingstone in delivering on the promise of the GCM, not an endpoint, and as we reflect and debrief we see clear next steps in our work towards migration justice.

 

 

Areas of work: Human Rights & Refugees

Explore more

A Call for Climate Action: Protect Human Rights and Decrease Military Expending

A Call for Climate Action: Protect Human Rights and Decrease Military Expending

HICC at the Human Rights Council QUNO participated in the climate and environmental discussions held in the 60th session Human Rights Council in Geneva. Through its Human Impacts of Climate Change (HICC) programme, QUNO delivered an oral statement on the critical role of human rights in climate action. Additionally, HICC contributed to a discussion on how military activities undermine the right to a healthy environment through their toxic and hazardous impacts.  Lindsey Fielder Cook, HICCโ€™s Representative, served as a panelist in the side event The Toxic Impact of Military Activities alongside the UN Special Rapporteur on Toxics and Human Rights, and representatives from Earthjustice, the Center for Global Nonkilling, and Dejusticia. The event discussed the findings and implications of the Special Rapporteurโ€™s recent report on the human rights impacts of hazardous substances and waste resulting from military operations. Building on the Quakers Peace Testimony, QUNO emphasized that war is an abomination of human rights and highlighted how this report proves that military activities harm human beings and earth far beyond wartimes. Lindsey also underscored that military activities are responsible for nearly 5.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions. However, countries are not required to report these emissions into their National Determined […]

โ€˜Deadlock of Imaginationโ€™: QUNO Invites Reflection on Approaches to Sustainable Energy Transformation at the Forum on Democracy and Climate Change

โ€˜Deadlock of Imaginationโ€™: QUNO Invites Reflection on Approaches to Sustainable Energy Transformation at the Forum on Democracy and Climate Change

Lindsey Fielder Cook, QUNOโ€™s Representative on the Human Impacts of Climate Change, pointed out clear pathways and criteria to achieve sustainable and equitable energy access at the Forum on Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law. In its 5th session, the Forum addressed the theme: โ€œDemocracy and Climate Change: Focusing on Solutionsโ€, held in Geneva on the 13th and 14th of October.ย  Her contribution can be watched here. Joining the panel on โ€œInterconnected Solutions to Interconnected Problemsโ€, Lindsey emphasized that democracies prioritizing the question, โ€œIs this best for society?โ€ rather than โ€œIs this best for the economy?โ€, are more likely to deliver a sustainable energy transition experienced as fair and effective.  In addition, energy transitions that integrate human rights-based approaches are less likely to face societal backlash. Lindsey advised asking the following questions when evaluating sustainable energy policies: Lindsey invoked the words of recently released from prison Egyptian/British human rights voice,  Alaa Abd el-Fattah, to highlight a divide in global energy transition dynamics, suggesting that we are facing a โ€œdeadlock of imaginationโ€ in the Global North and a โ€œdeadlock of possibilityโ€ in the Global South.Other panelists provided clear examples and best practices on rights-based solutions in the sectors of […]

At the Human Rights Council: Renewed Calls for Independent Human Rights Monitoring at International Borders

At the Human Rights Council: Renewed Calls for Independent Human Rights Monitoring at International Borders

At the 60th session of the Human Rights Council, attention turned once again to the urgent need for stronger human rights monitoring in migration governance. On 25 September 2025, QUNO co-hosted a side event to launch the new report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on human rights monitoring in the context of migration and build on previous side events on this topic. Opening the discussion, Peggy Hicks (OHCHR) underlined the urgency of collective action: โ€œWe must do more, and we must do it together.โ€ The OHCHR report on human rights monitoring highlights how migrants face serious protection gaps at borders, including pushbacks, arbitrary detention, profiling and violence. A proactive monitoring process of collecting, verifying, and analyzing information to identify and prevent human rights violations in migration are needed to prevent these violations, strengthen accountability, and uphold Statesโ€™ obligations to protect the rights of all people on the move. The report makes clear that monitoring is not an end in itself. Its ultimate purpose is to document violations, identify patterns and causes, and drive systemic change. Yet access barriers, lack of independence, and insufficient resources continue to hinder effective oversight. The reportโ€™s final recommendation […]

Safeguarding Conscientious Objectors Amid Rising Militarization

Safeguarding Conscientious Objectors Amid Rising Militarization

In a world of accelerating militarization, the act of refusing to fight is bold and powerful. States justify mass conscription in the name of security and those who object are portrayed as traitors. Yet international law is clear: conscientious objection to military service is a protected human right. It is inherent in freedom of thought, conscience, and religion, enshrined in Article 18 of both the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. No derogation[BM1]  (without an exception) is permitted; not in wartime, mobilization, or national emergency. Despite this clarity, violations remain widespread. Conscientious objectors are imprisoned, denied education and employment, and cut off from basic civil and social rights. At a recent Human Rights Council side event, objectors shared testimonies exposing the personal cost of standing against militarization. Their stories are not isolated, but evidence of systemic disregard for binding obligations. Rachel Brett on behalf of QUNO set out the relevant international law and stressed the importance of ensuring that this is respected in practice (full text below). She highlighted that access to recognition as conscientious objectors is especially critical during wartime, when normal provisions for release from military service are often suspended. […]

Inclusive Dialogue on Migration: Preparing for the IMRF through Connection and Collaboration

Inclusive Dialogue on Migration: Preparing for the IMRF through Connection and Collaboration

The Inclusive Dialogue on Migration was created to build understanding between States, migrants, and migrant-led organizations, and to strengthen cooperation in the governance of migration. At its heart lies a simple idea: meaningful dialogue can open the way for more inclusive, humane, and effective migration policy. The Inclusive Dialogue on Migration is not a conference series but a continuing process; a space intentionally designed to bring together those who shape migration policy and those who live its realities. It aims to level the field for dialogue, allowing diplomats, migrants, and migrant-led organizations to exchange perspectives as equals. Most recently, participants gathered in person in Geneva and online as part of the 2025 series. This event provided an opportunity to reflect collectively on shared priorities, explore how inclusion can be strengthened in global migration processes, and identify concrete ways to collaborate in the lead-up to the International Migration Review Forum, IMRF. At its core, the Dialogue seeks to strengthen understanding and trust, and to explore how inclusive participation can make migration governance more effective, fair, and grounded in human experience. Through open and respectful conversation, participants identify shared challenges and opportunities for collaboration, guided by the belief that migration policies work […]

Building the New Myanmar โ€“ QUNO hosts a public event with Myanmarโ€™s National Unity Government

Building the New Myanmar โ€“ QUNO hosts a public event with Myanmarโ€™s National Unity Government

When the UN General Assembly opens each September, all UN member states are invited to address the world body. For the past three years, this has not been true for Myanmar. Following the February 2021 military coup, no statement has been delivered on behalf of Myanmar because national leadership remains contested between the military and the people’s movement that opposes the military’s takeover. Each side claims to represent the people of Myanmar. On October 2, QUNO co-hosted a panel event with representatives of Myanmar’s opposition movement. Under the title, Building the New Myanmar: Democracy, Justice, and Peace for the People of Myanmar, the panel presentation provided an opportunity for UN diplomats, UN staff, and civil society partners to hear directly from representatives of Myanmar’s National Unity Government (NUG) and its National Unity Consultative Council (NUCC). Moderated by QUNO Director Sarah Clarke, the panel included Zin Mar Aung, Foreign Minister; Aung Kyaw Moe, Deputy Minister for Human Rights for the NUG; plus Z Nang Raw, a civil society representative to the NUCC. Speaking to a crowd of over 50 guests, Sarah introduced the panel, noting, “The diversity of this panel reflects the diversity of Myanmar itself. Myanmar’s diversity is one of […]