Newsroom

International Solidarity with Palestine Solidifies at the Outset of the 79th Session of the General Assembly

10th October 2024

2024

On 17 September, the UN General Assembly convened for an emergency session to consider a resolution calling for the implementation of this summer’s opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, which focused on Israeli settlements and called for their withdrawal. The State of Palestine introduced a resolution to implement the ICJ decision, which includes a timeline for Israel’s withdrawal from all settlements in the  Occupied Palestinian Territory, which the ICJ deemed illegal under international law. However, as representatives commenced debate on the resolution, reports of pagers exploding across Lebanon began to make headlines. The attack, which exploded pagers and walkie-talkies and targeted Hezbollah members, killed at least 42 people, including children, while also injuring thousands of civilians.  

The escalation from pager explosions to Israel’s heavy bombing of civilian areas overshadowed the annual gathering of world leaders to open the new UN General Assembly Session and followed a week of emergency meetings on the deepening crisis rapidly spreading further across the region. Against this backdrop of increasing militarism and violence, many leaders expressed frustration with a double standard of when and to whom international law applies and with the scale of human suffering to which we are all bearing witness. As President Mohamed Irfaan Ali of Guyana declared, “Israel continues to flout its international obligations…Instead, the right of self-defense is being used as a weapon of mass extermination, stoking legitimate fears of genocide.” Leaders of neighboring states like Türkiye, Jordan, Kuwait, Iraq, Libya, and Tunisia took time on the floor of the General Assembly to emphasize this point and condemn the continuous escalation of violence as a threat to the peace and security of the region.  

Secretary-General António Guterres addressed these concerns at the opening of the General Assembly, stating that “[a] growing number of governments and others feel entitled to a ‘get out of jail free’ card. They can trample international law. They can turn a blind eye to international human rights conventions or the decisions of international courts. And nothing will happen.” The comments of the Secretary-General and those of a number of other representatives who gave statements suggests a growing unease between nations that have historically held influence and those that have not. 

In light of the anniversary of the attacks on 7 October, it is essential to remember the human cost of this conflict, which grows more dire each day for everyone in the region. While media coverage of the devastation in Gaza is often dehumanizing, the message from the overwhelming global majority, particularly from those in the Global South, was one of solidarity and shared humanity. A shared humanity that criticized the Israeli government’s actions while expressing hope for Israeli citizens to be able to live in peace with their neighbors and also called for the release of all hostages.  

For small countries the fear was clear that if a Permanent Member of the Security Council used the veto to block action towards a ceasefire or allowed the withholding of humanitarian aid for some, then it was possible that they could be next. Trinidad and Tobago’s Foreign Minister Amery Browne made a powerful statement: “The continued resourcing of these ongoing violations of international law sends a chilling message to the global south…, some powerful people in this world that are of the view that a Palestinian child is less worthy of defense, protection, food, water, and life than another child.” He continued to express that Trinidad & Tobago and decent people all over the world do not share that view. 

In this context of established solidarity among the majority of UN member states, calls for reform to the United Nations, especially to the UN Security Council, were a focus of many speeches during high-level week. Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves of St. Vincent and the Grenadines asserted that the genocide in Gaza, as well as the multitude of conflicts around the world, are failures of the multilateral system’s outdated design from an era of lingering colonialism. He and numerous other leaders called for reform of the UN Security Council to more equitably represent the Global South and to respond more effectively to international crises that cause such catastrophic human suffering. Leaders from Indonesia and Malaysia stressed the Security Council’s role in facilitating that suffering, stating that the failure to hold Israel accountable to humanitarian law is due to the abuse of veto power by a few states.  

Immediately following the speech from Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Barbados Mia Mottley began her address by calling for a reset for the international system. Holding a hand to her heart, she declared, “…we cannot afford the distraction of war. If ever there was a time to pause and reset, it is now.” Calls for reform emphasized the reality that war and spending on militarization distract from investment in areas that will build sustainable peace for all people. Because peace is not simply the absence of violent conflict between states, leaders reiterated that resolving war is only the first step in providing stability and security for people in Gaza, Lebanon, Ukraine, Haiti, Sudan, and all other places in conflict.  

Image: UN Photo/Loey Felipe

Areas of work:

Explore more

QUNO Representative brings Quaker Perspective to Disaster Resiliency

QUNO Representative brings Quaker Perspective to Disaster Resiliency

QUNO NY Representative Kavita Desai had the rare opportunity to moderate a panel at the United Nations entitled โ€œInvesting in Resilience to Safeguard the Sustainable Development Goalsโ€ during a special event held on October 16, 2025, hosted by the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) and the UN Economic and Financial Committee.  The UNDRR event, โ€œTowards a Risk-informed approach to Development: Financing Resilient Development Today for a Sustainable Tomorrow,โ€ highlighted the need to increase investment in disaster protection measures such as early warning systems, community protection plans, and resilient infrastructure to safeguard progress made towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), a series of 17 globally agreed-upon goals that form a blueprint for sustainable peace and prosperity. As Desai noted in her opening remarks, โ€œIt is well known that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure…investing in DRR saves resources in the long-term and futureproofs development gains.โ€   Desaiโ€™s panel provided valuable insight on the necessity of financing resilient development, warning that progress towards the SDGs has been limited and that current investments in disaster risk and resilience account for only about 25% of actual needs in many countries. The panel noted that this funding gap emerges […]

Real Costs of the Push to Rearm in Europe and Beyond: Implications for Arms Control, Business and Human Rights, and International Law

Real Costs of the Push to Rearm in Europe and Beyond: Implications for Arms Control, Business and Human Rights, and International Law

To discuss the costs and risks of exponentially rising military spending, the Quaker United Nations Office (QUNO) Geneva, together with the American Bar Association Center for Human Rights (ABA CHR) and the Womenโ€™s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF), co-hosted a public webinar involving a panel of 5 experts from diverse fields. The event, โ€œThe Real Costs of the Push to Rearm in Europe and Beyond: Implications for Arms Control, Business and Human Rights, and International Lawโ€ explored how the rapid increase in global defence budgets affects social investment, democratic governance, and climate resilience. It was attended by a broad community, with participants from the fields of disarmament, arms control, peace-building, human rights, humanitarian law, climate change, gender equality, representing governments, international organizations, academia, civil society, and members of the general public. Setting the Scene Dr. Yvette Issar (QUNO) underscored that global military spending has reached an all-time high of 2.7 trillion USD, a figure projected to rise sharply in the coming decade. These rising figures โ€œare not yielding greater peace, but are instead undermining our shared vision for a sustainable future.โ€ The following guiding questions were posed at the outset of the discussion: Dr. Nan Tian (SIPRI) outlined current trends in military expenditure, describing an โ€œexceptionally […]

A Call for Climate Action: Protect Human Rights and Decrease Military Expending

A Call for Climate Action: Protect Human Rights and Decrease Military Expending

HICC at the Human Rights Council QUNO participated in the climate and environmental discussions held in the 60th session Human Rights Council in Geneva. Through its Human Impacts of Climate Change (HICC) programme, QUNO delivered an oral statement on the critical role of human rights in climate action. Additionally, HICC contributed to a discussion on how military activities undermine the right to a healthy environment through their toxic and hazardous impacts.  Lindsey Fielder Cook, HICCโ€™s Representative, served as a panelist in the side event The Toxic Impact of Military Activities alongside the UN Special Rapporteur on Toxics and Human Rights, and representatives from Earthjustice, the Center for Global Nonkilling, and Dejusticia. The event discussed the findings and implications of the Special Rapporteurโ€™s recent report on the human rights impacts of hazardous substances and waste resulting from military operations. Building on the Quakers Peace Testimony, QUNO emphasized that war is an abomination of human rights and highlighted how this report proves that military activities harm human beings and earth far beyond wartimes. Lindsey also underscored that military activities are responsible for nearly 5.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions. However, countries are not required to report these emissions into their National Determined […]

โ€˜Deadlock of Imaginationโ€™: QUNO Invites Reflection on Approaches to Sustainable Energy Transformation at the Forum on Democracy and Climate Change

โ€˜Deadlock of Imaginationโ€™: QUNO Invites Reflection on Approaches to Sustainable Energy Transformation at the Forum on Democracy and Climate Change

Lindsey Fielder Cook, QUNOโ€™s Representative on the Human Impacts of Climate Change, pointed out clear pathways and criteria to achieve sustainable and equitable energy access at the Forum on Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law. In its 5th session, the Forum addressed the theme: โ€œDemocracy and Climate Change: Focusing on Solutionsโ€, held in Geneva on the 13th and 14th of October.ย  Her contribution can be watched here. Joining the panel on โ€œInterconnected Solutions to Interconnected Problemsโ€, Lindsey emphasized that democracies prioritizing the question, โ€œIs this best for society?โ€ rather than โ€œIs this best for the economy?โ€, are more likely to deliver a sustainable energy transition experienced as fair and effective.  In addition, energy transitions that integrate human rights-based approaches are less likely to face societal backlash. Lindsey advised asking the following questions when evaluating sustainable energy policies: Lindsey invoked the words of recently released from prison Egyptian/British human rights voice,  Alaa Abd el-Fattah, to highlight a divide in global energy transition dynamics, suggesting that we are facing a โ€œdeadlock of imaginationโ€ in the Global North and a โ€œdeadlock of possibilityโ€ in the Global South.Other panelists provided clear examples and best practices on rights-based solutions in the sectors of […]

At the Human Rights Council: Renewed Calls for Independent Human Rights Monitoring at International Borders

At the Human Rights Council: Renewed Calls for Independent Human Rights Monitoring at International Borders

At the 60th session of the Human Rights Council, attention turned once again to the urgent need for stronger human rights monitoring in migration governance. On 25 September 2025, QUNO co-hosted a side event to launch the new report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on human rights monitoring in the context of migration and build on previous side events on this topic. Opening the discussion, Peggy Hicks (OHCHR) underlined the urgency of collective action: โ€œWe must do more, and we must do it together.โ€ The OHCHR report on human rights monitoring highlights how migrants face serious protection gaps at borders, including pushbacks, arbitrary detention, profiling and violence. A proactive monitoring process of collecting, verifying, and analyzing information to identify and prevent human rights violations in migration are needed to prevent these violations, strengthen accountability, and uphold Statesโ€™ obligations to protect the rights of all people on the move. The report makes clear that monitoring is not an end in itself. Its ultimate purpose is to document violations, identify patterns and causes, and drive systemic change. Yet access barriers, lack of independence, and insufficient resources continue to hinder effective oversight. The reportโ€™s final recommendation […]

Safeguarding Conscientious Objectors Amid Rising Militarization

Safeguarding Conscientious Objectors Amid Rising Militarization

In a world of accelerating militarization, the act of refusing to fight is bold and powerful. States justify mass conscription in the name of security and those who object are portrayed as traitors. Yet international law is clear: conscientious objection to military service is a protected human right. It is inherent in freedom of thought, conscience, and religion, enshrined in Article 18 of both the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. No derogation[BM1]  (without an exception) is permitted; not in wartime, mobilization, or national emergency. Despite this clarity, violations remain widespread. Conscientious objectors are imprisoned, denied education and employment, and cut off from basic civil and social rights. At a recent Human Rights Council side event, objectors shared testimonies exposing the personal cost of standing against militarization. Their stories are not isolated, but evidence of systemic disregard for binding obligations. Rachel Brett on behalf of QUNO set out the relevant international law and stressed the importance of ensuring that this is respected in practice (full text below). She highlighted that access to recognition as conscientious objectors is especially critical during wartime, when normal provisions for release from military service are often suspended. […]