Newsroom

Newsroom

International Migration Review Forum: Consensus Adoption of Progress Declaration a Significant Step Forward

10th June 2022

Laurel and Marisa at IMRF

The first International Migration Review Forum (IMRF) took place in New York from May 16th to the 20th, gathering Member States, civil society representatives, migrants, and United Nations agencies. The IMRF was the first global opportunity to review the implementation of the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly, and Regular Migration (GCM) and discuss challenges since its adoption in 2018.  Following a multistakeholder hearing, the four-day Forum concluded with the adoption by consensus of the Progress Declaration. The endorsement by the General Assembly of the Progress Declaration on June 7th also by consensus indicates a welcome step in the maturing of migration multilateralism in the UN and grounded in human rights.

The IMRF has been a significant focus for the Human Rights and Refugees (HRR) Programme as we have sought to support progress on dismantling systemic racism in migration governance, advance meaningful migrant participation, prevent deaths and loss of life, and ensure human rights-based post-COVID migration governance, including in relation to border management in health crises.

In addition to a series of briefing papers on both process and positions, QUNO engaged with the development of the Progress Declaration, speaking at all four townhalls with the co-facilitators and engaging with diplomats in New York.

At the IMRF, Laurel Townhead Representative for the HRR programme, moderated the first thematic session of the multistakeholder hearing in which she remarked, “stakeholders are not just partners in implementation, crucially we are also critics, advocates, eyes, and ears open to the lived realities of the success and failures of migration governance for people and communities. If everything you hear today suggests unbounded progress or if everything you hear today is comfortable, then we are not having the right conversation. Because for too many people migration is not comfortable, it is not safe. And to ignore this would add to the dehumanization of migrants and would be a disservice to what we can do collectively if we ground our aims in the recognition of the inherent dignity and the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family”.The recording of the multistakeholder session is available here and the link to summary report here.

QUNO co-sponsored two side events:

  • By Migrants, For Migrants: Advancing for Migrant’s Meaningful Participation in IMRF and the GCM Processes, where Marisa Leon Gomez Sonet spoke:  Meaningful participation is not a simple tick-box exercise, nor is it inherently neutral. It is often said that migrants do not have a voice and that others can provide that voice. Migrants do have a voice, they have agency and resiliency, but are often excluded and marginalized. See the recording of the migrant participation side event.
  • Preparedness for the Next Pandemic: Towards a Resilient Global Architecture on Borders and Health, Laurel spoke: I hope this collective endeavor will succeed for governments and for migrants in all their diversity because a global border and health architecture that meets these [human rights based]criteria is not just the smart thing to do from governance, economic, predictability, perspective. It is also the right thing to do from a human perspective. See the recording of the side event here.

We were grateful for the opportunity to be in person again amongst so many people bringing their expertise and experience to bear on improving migration governance, not because of the economic benefits of migration for States but because of the inherent humanity of all migrants. We also want to acknowledge those who could not join us at the IMRF – for a multiplicity of reasons: because they could not access vaccines and documentation that would enable travel; because they do not think UN rooms are places where they are welcome or will be heard; because they are in a place of struggle and survival; because it would not be safe for them to engage; because, as the Secretary-General highlighted in his report, deterrence based migration policies lead to irreparable harm.

The IMRF was a steppingstone in delivering on the promise of the GCM, not an endpoint, and as we reflect and debrief we see clear next steps in our work towards migration justice.

 

 

Areas of work: Human Rights & Refugees

Explore more

Myanmar “sham elections”: QUNO hosts Quaker House briefing

Myanmar “sham elections”: QUNO hosts Quaker House briefing

On 2 December, the Quaker UN Office hosted diplomats at Quaker House for a private briefing in advance of the elections in Myanmar that began on 28 December 2025. QUNO Director, Sarah Clarke, opened the meeting, noting that “the world will be watching carefully to see how the international community responds to the vote.”  Sean Dunne, an expert who has supported election observation with the UN and the Carter Center, including in Myanmar, served as an outside briefer. In his remarks, Sean emphasized that the Myanmar general elections, which are being conducted by the military regime that overthrew the democratically elected government following elections in 2020, “fail to meet any recognized international benchmark for credibility or genuineness.” Sean concurred with UN experts, numerous Human Rights organizations, and media outlets describing the elections as a “charade” or “sham election” intended to “solicit recognition from foreign governments and legitimize the continuation of military rule, rather than reflect the genuine will of the Myanmar people.”  In Myanmar, voting kicked off on 28 December 2025, with polls being held in roughly a third of Myanmar’s townships. Despite two more voting phases scheduled on 11 and 25 January 2026, several million people, 56 townships, and numerous political parties, including the winner of Myanmar’s last credible election, the National League for Democracy, have been excluded by the military or have chosen not to participate.   As Sean explained, these exclusionary factors amount to “an incredibly sophisticated form of election engineering.” The implementation of biometric voting and surveillance technology, new laws criminalizing criticism of the election, and manipulation of representative quotas in Myanmar’s […]

The 2025 Peacebuilding Architecture Review: Progress, Omissions, and What’s at Stake

The 2025 Peacebuilding Architecture Review: Progress, Omissions, and What’s at Stake

The United Nations’ Peacebuilding Architecture Review (PBAR) takes place every five years, providing UN actors and other stakeholders with an opportunity to review and improve the implementation and impact of the UN’s peacebuilding efforts. The year 2025 marked the fourth review since the creation of the UN peacebuilding architecture, comprised of the Peacebuilding Commission (PBC), the Peacebuilding Fund (PBF), and the Peacebuilding Support Office (PBSO). This most recent review occurred within a global context of notably pervasive conflict, high military expenditures, widespread political instability, and apprehension towards multilateralism. While the 2025 PBAR was more comprehensive than past PBARs, it also saw unprecedented acts of language dilution and omission, revealing disagreements among member states on key issues.   The 2025 review features changes in language and introduces new provisions that set it apart from earlier reviews. Notable omissions include references to multilateralism, gender, The Pact for the Future, The PBC Action Plan on Youth, and provisions for a PBC annual review of the Security Council agenda. Language on sustained financing for peacebuilding was also omitted. These shifts expose new gaps, making it harder for member states to prioritize these essential areas in the peacebuilding architecture’s objectives and implementation. Simultaneously, the twin […]

Applications Now Open for QUNO New York Programme Assistants 

Applications Now Open for QUNO New York Programme Assistants 

The Quaker United Nations Office in New York is now accepting Programme Assistant applications for the 2026-2027 year. This is an exciting opportunity for young professionals to gain experience at the United Nations, and to both learn about and contribute to Quaker work at the UN. The application is open to both Quakers and those who align with Quaker values. QUNO highly encourages those interested in international affairs, peacebuilding, and quiet diplomacy to apply. The application period closes February 16th, 2026.   Status: Full – Time, Specific Term (12 months) Beginning September 1, 2026 Location: New York, NY Application Deadline: February 16th, 2026, 11:59pm Eastern Time For consideration, please attach your Cover Letter and Resume to the online application here in addition to answering the Application Questions.

QUNO attends COP30 in Brazil: Report 2 of 2

QUNO attends COP30 in Brazil: Report 2 of 2

QUNO participated in the Conference of the Parties (COP30), held from 9–23 November in Belém, Brazil. Following the first report on QUNO’s activities at COP30 (available here), this second report provides an analysis of key areas of concern as well as positive outcomes observed during the conference. This report explains why COP30 was far from an uneventful COP. Hosted in the heart of the Amazon rainforest, COP30 witnessed a renewed presence of civil society and Indigenous Peoples, intense protests spilling into the venue, and even a fire incident. Within the negotiation rooms, coordinated strategies of denial tried to silence language on fossil fuels, the latest climate science, the major drivers of greenhouse gas emissions, and even the recognition of human rights. However, at COP30, that thick wall of denial began to show cracks, emerging from different negotiation groups. By the end of the conference, participants observed early flowers blooming from these cracks in the form of emerging coalitions bringing together developed, developing, and least developed countries. To read the full report, please download the document below.

Applications are Now Open: Quaker United Nations Summer School 2026

Applications are Now Open: Quaker United Nations Summer School 2026

We are excited to announce that the applications for the Quaker United Nations Office Summer School (QUNSS) 2026 are now open!  QUNSS is a two-week programme where young changemakers are introduced to the United Nations and the vibrant international community in Geneva to deepen their understanding of multilateralism, strengthen their policy, negotiation, and advocacy skills, and connect with a supportive international youth network rooted in Quaker values to promote peace, justice, and the protection of Earth.  This year’s themed edition will explore today’s debates on the value and challenges of multilateralism, supporting participants to accurately understand, critically question, and humanize the United Nations.  Over the course of the programme, participants will:  We welcome applications from young people aged 20–26 from all regions and backgrounds who are globally minded, locally rooted, and involved in areas such as social justice, community engagement, climate action, advocacy, or policy, among others.  The deadline for applications is January 25th, 2026 at 23:59 Central European Time (CET).  For the full description of QUNSS 2026, please see the document below. To apply, please access this application form.

At a critical moment, Security Council Resolution on Gaza falls short

At a critical moment, Security Council Resolution on Gaza falls short

On Monday, November 17, the UN Security Council adopted resolution 2803 (2025) authorizing the creation of an “International Stabilization Force” and a “Board of Peace” aimed at addressing the critical security, humanitarian, and reconstruction needs in Gaza. The resolution affirms the importance of enabling humanitarian aid, maintaining a ceasefire, and the goal of working towards “a horizon for peaceful and prosperous coexistence.” However, QUNO notes with concern the resolution’s disregard for the consent or agency of Palestinians within the mechanisms proposed by the resolution. Furthermore, the resolution fails to establish clear mechanisms for transparency, accountability, and effective humanitarian aid and reconstruction. Both observers and UN member states have pointed out that the resolution’s unilateral approach could sideline the United Nations and risk repeating colonial actions and ideologies that lie at the heart of the conflict.   At its core, the Security Council resolution gives UN backing to the “Comprehensive Peace Plan,” also known as the “20-point plan,” proposed by US President Donald Trump earlier this year. The United States proposed the resolution and lobbied strenuously to push it through the Security Council on an expedited timeline. The resolution gives a green light to main tenets of the President’s plan, principally, […]