Newsroom

Newsroom

Building the New Myanmar – QUNO hosts a public event with Myanmar’s National Unity Government

31st October 2025

When the UN General Assembly opens each September, all UN member states are invited to address the world body. For the past three years, this has not been true for Myanmar. Following the February 2021 military coup, no statement has been delivered on behalf of Myanmar because national leadership remains contested between the military and the people’s movement that opposes the military’s takeover. Each side claims to represent the people of Myanmar.

On October 2, QUNO co-hosted a panel event with representatives of Myanmar’s opposition movement. Under the title, Building the New Myanmar: Democracy, Justice, and Peace for the People of Myanmar, the panel presentation provided an opportunity for UN diplomats, UN staff, and civil society partners to hear directly from representatives of Myanmar’s National Unity Government (NUG) and its National Unity Consultative Council (NUCC). Moderated by QUNO Director Sarah Clarke, the panel included Zin Mar Aung, Foreign Minister; Aung Kyaw Moe, Deputy Minister for Human Rights for the NUG; plus Z Nang Raw, a civil society representative to the NUCC.

Speaking to a crowd of over 50 guests, Sarah introduced the panel, noting, “The diversity of this panel reflects the diversity of Myanmar itself. Myanmar’s diversity is one of the most beautiful aspects of the country, and it has long been manipulated and used as a driver of conflict. But as we can see from our panel today, unity across diversity, cooperation, and collaboration will ultimately pave the way to a peaceful Myanmar”.

The speakers went on to outline their vision for a future Myanmar. They called on the international community to take the concrete steps needed to stop the mass violence and human rights violations being carried out by the military against the people of Myanmar.

Panelists focused their remarks on elections, which the military has scheduled for the end of December. The Foreign Minister, Zin Mar Aung, explained that the military was motivated to hold elections to achieve legitimacy and recognition:

“The military junta is looking for a way out for themselves, not the way out for the people or our country. After this coup, they desperately need recognition and legitimacy. But the scam election proposed by the military junta is not a solution. Most political parties have been banned from participating, criticism has been criminalized, most ethnic groups [in the borderlands] will not be able to vote, and many even within the [central] Burma region will not be able to vote. The outcome will not represent the will of the people. It is a trap used by the military junta to gain legitimacy.”

The panel presentation took place following the UN’s High-Level Conference on Rohingya Muslims and Other Minorities, which was held at the UN on September 30. The panelists articulated a vision of Myanmar based on the inclusion of all, regardless of their ethnic identity. Aung Kyaw Moe, the Deputy Minister of Human Rights and a member of the Rohingya community, noted that his appointment as Deputy Minister for Human Rights represented a concrete step towards this reality. He said, “In building the new inclusive federal democracy, everyone’s equal participation is important; everyone’s equal contribution is important. It is not about asking for rights alone. It is also about fulfilling obligations to the nation, including for the Rohingya”. He concluded by highlighting the NUG’s Rohingya policy and its commitment to repeal the discriminatory 1982 citizenship law.

Z Nang Raw further developed this vision of an inclusive future for Myanmar. Speaking from the perspective of an ethnic Kachin community leader, she noted the key role that Myanmar civil society organizations, especially women’s organizations, have played. Nang Raw highlighted the deadly challenges that women’s organizations have had to endure inside Myanmar while continuing to provide humanitarian aid and leading new forms of local governance in areas outside of military control.
The panelists shared a summary document, providing a synopsis of the current context and outlining concrete recommendations. The document can be accessed below.

While QUNO’s work on Myanmar usually takes place through smaller, off-the-record meetings at Quaker House, this public event was planned to build on the attention coming out of the opening of the UN General Assembly and the UN’s High-Level Rohingya Conference. Over the coming months, QUNO staff will continue to facilitate opportunities for UN partners to take part in private briefings and discussions regarding the situation on the ground. These opportunities for information sharing and dialogue are crucial as the international community seeks out ways to support a peaceful outcome.

Photo Credit: Kyaw Soe Latt

Areas of work: New York | Supporting the UN’s Role for Peace in Myanmar | Supporting the UN’s Role for Peace in Regional Contexts

Explore more

A Call for Climate Action: Protect Human Rights and Decrease Military Expending

A Call for Climate Action: Protect Human Rights and Decrease Military Expending

HICC at the Human Rights Council QUNO participated in the climate and environmental discussions held in the 60th session Human Rights Council in Geneva. Through its Human Impacts of Climate Change (HICC) programme, QUNO delivered an oral statement on the critical role of human rights in climate action. Additionally, HICC contributed to a discussion on how military activities undermine the right to a healthy environment through their toxic and hazardous impacts.  Lindsey Fielder Cook, HICC’s Representative, served as a panelist in the side event The Toxic Impact of Military Activities alongside the UN Special Rapporteur on Toxics and Human Rights, and representatives from Earthjustice, the Center for Global Nonkilling, and Dejusticia. The event discussed the findings and implications of the Special Rapporteur’s recent report on the human rights impacts of hazardous substances and waste resulting from military operations. Building on the Quakers Peace Testimony, QUNO emphasized that war is an abomination of human rights and highlighted how this report proves that military activities harm human beings and earth far beyond wartimes. Lindsey also underscored that military activities are responsible for nearly 5.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions. However, countries are not required to report these emissions into their National Determined […]

‘Deadlock of Imagination’: QUNO Invites Reflection on Approaches to Sustainable Energy Transformation at the Forum on Democracy and Climate Change

‘Deadlock of Imagination’: QUNO Invites Reflection on Approaches to Sustainable Energy Transformation at the Forum on Democracy and Climate Change

Lindsey Fielder Cook, QUNO’s Representative on the Human Impacts of Climate Change, pointed out clear pathways and criteria to achieve sustainable and equitable energy access at the Forum on Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law. In its 5th session, the Forum addressed the theme: “Democracy and Climate Change: Focusing on Solutions”, held in Geneva on the 13th and 14th of October.  Her contribution can be watched here. Joining the panel on “Interconnected Solutions to Interconnected Problems”, Lindsey emphasized that democracies prioritizing the question, “Is this best for society?” rather than “Is this best for the economy?”, are more likely to deliver a sustainable energy transition experienced as fair and effective.  In addition, energy transitions that integrate human rights-based approaches are less likely to face societal backlash. Lindsey advised asking the following questions when evaluating sustainable energy policies: Lindsey invoked the words of recently released from prison Egyptian/British human rights voice,  Alaa Abd el-Fattah, to highlight a divide in global energy transition dynamics, suggesting that we are facing a “deadlock of imagination” in the Global North and a “deadlock of possibility” in the Global South.Other panelists provided clear examples and best practices on rights-based solutions in the sectors of […]

At the Human Rights Council: Renewed Calls for Independent Human Rights Monitoring at International Borders

At the Human Rights Council: Renewed Calls for Independent Human Rights Monitoring at International Borders

At the 60th session of the Human Rights Council, attention turned once again to the urgent need for stronger human rights monitoring in migration governance. On 25 September 2025, QUNO co-hosted a side event to launch the new report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on human rights monitoring in the context of migration and build on previous side events on this topic. Opening the discussion, Peggy Hicks (OHCHR) underlined the urgency of collective action: “We must do more, and we must do it together.” The OHCHR report on human rights monitoring highlights how migrants face serious protection gaps at borders, including pushbacks, arbitrary detention, profiling and violence. A proactive monitoring process of collecting, verifying, and analyzing information to identify and prevent human rights violations in migration are needed to prevent these violations, strengthen accountability, and uphold States’ obligations to protect the rights of all people on the move. The report makes clear that monitoring is not an end in itself. Its ultimate purpose is to document violations, identify patterns and causes, and drive systemic change. Yet access barriers, lack of independence, and insufficient resources continue to hinder effective oversight. The report’s final recommendation […]

Safeguarding Conscientious Objectors Amid Rising Militarization

Safeguarding Conscientious Objectors Amid Rising Militarization

In a world of accelerating militarization, the act of refusing to fight is bold and powerful. States justify mass conscription in the name of security and those who object are portrayed as traitors. Yet international law is clear: conscientious objection to military service is a protected human right. It is inherent in freedom of thought, conscience, and religion, enshrined in Article 18 of both the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. No derogation[BM1]  (without an exception) is permitted; not in wartime, mobilization, or national emergency. Despite this clarity, violations remain widespread. Conscientious objectors are imprisoned, denied education and employment, and cut off from basic civil and social rights. At a recent Human Rights Council side event, objectors shared testimonies exposing the personal cost of standing against militarization. Their stories are not isolated, but evidence of systemic disregard for binding obligations. Rachel Brett on behalf of QUNO set out the relevant international law and stressed the importance of ensuring that this is respected in practice (full text below). She highlighted that access to recognition as conscientious objectors is especially critical during wartime, when normal provisions for release from military service are often suspended. […]

Inclusive Dialogue on Migration: Preparing for the IMRF through Connection and Collaboration

Inclusive Dialogue on Migration: Preparing for the IMRF through Connection and Collaboration

The Inclusive Dialogue on Migration was created to build understanding between States, migrants, and migrant-led organizations, and to strengthen cooperation in the governance of migration. At its heart lies a simple idea: meaningful dialogue can open the way for more inclusive, humane, and effective migration policy. The Inclusive Dialogue on Migration is not a conference series but a continuing process; a space intentionally designed to bring together those who shape migration policy and those who live its realities. It aims to level the field for dialogue, allowing diplomats, migrants, and migrant-led organizations to exchange perspectives as equals. Most recently, participants gathered in person in Geneva and online as part of the 2025 series. This event provided an opportunity to reflect collectively on shared priorities, explore how inclusion can be strengthened in global migration processes, and identify concrete ways to collaborate in the lead-up to the International Migration Review Forum, IMRF. At its core, the Dialogue seeks to strengthen understanding and trust, and to explore how inclusive participation can make migration governance more effective, fair, and grounded in human experience. Through open and respectful conversation, participants identify shared challenges and opportunities for collaboration, guided by the belief that migration policies work […]

Marking Milestones: Reflecting on 80 Years of the UN’s Work for Women, Youth, and Climate Action

Marking Milestones: Reflecting on 80 Years of the UN’s Work for Women, Youth, and Climate Action

During September’s high-level week, world leaders gathered in New York for the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) under the theme, “Better together: 80 years and more for peace, development, and human rights.” The week reflected on eight decades of UN work while spotlighting some of today’s most pressing global challenges. Delegations also marked three major anniversaries: the 30th anniversary of The Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, the 30th anniversary of the World Programme of Action for Youth, and the 10th anniversary of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change. Why does marking the anniversaries of these agreements matter? The high-level discussions of these milestones offered opportunities not only to take stock of progress but also to confront the gaps that remain since the agreements were created. The gathering on women reaffirmed the urgency of addressing gender-based violence, closing political and economic gender gaps, and ensuring women’s full participation in climate and peace processes. At the youth-focused discussions, speakers emphasized that today’s generation—one of the largest in history—remains excluded from decision-making despite leading on climate action, technology, and local solutions. The climate sessions carried an unmistakable tone of urgency, with calls for stronger targets, faster timelines, and […]